| 
EPA Registers Long-Term Uses of
    Sulfoxaflor While Ensuring Strong Pollinator Protection 
    
 
Registration provides
    benefits to growers and is supported by strong science that shows minimal
    risks for pollinators 
    
 
Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency (EPA) is issuing a long-term approval for the insecticide
    sulfoxaflor  ̶  an effective tool to control challenging
    pests with fewer environmental impacts. After conducting an extensive risk
    analysis, including the review of one of the agency’s largest datasets on
    the effects of a pesticide on bees, EPA is approving the use of sulfoxaflor
    on alfalfa, corn, cacao, grains (millet, oats), pineapple, sorghum, teff,
    teosinte, tree plantations, citrus, cotton, cucurbits (squash, cucumbers,
    watermelons, some gourds), soybeans, and strawberries. 
“EPA is providing long-term certainty for
    U.S. growers to use an important tool to protect crops and avoid
    potentially significant economic losses, while maintaining strong protection
    for pollinators,” said Alexandra Dapolito Dunn, assistant administrator for
    EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “Today’s decision
    shows the agency’s commitment to making decisions that are based on sound
    science.” 
Sulfoxaflor is an important and highly
    effective tool for growers that targets difficult pests such as sugarcane
    aphids and tarnished plant bugs, also known as lygus. These pests can
    damage crops and cause significant economic loss. Additionally, there are
    few viable alternatives for sulfoxaflor for these pests. In many cases,
    alternative insecticides may be effective only if applied repeatedly or in
    a tank mix, whereas sulfoxaflor often requires fewer applications,
    resulting in less risk to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife. 
EPA’s registration also includes updated
    requirements for product labels, which will include crop-specific
    restrictions and pollinator protection language. 
Background 
In 2016, following a 2015 decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of
    Appeals vacating the registration of sulfoxaflor citing inadequate data on
    the effects on bees, EPA reevaluated the data and approved registrations that did not
    include crops that attract bees. The 2016 registration allowed fewer uses
    than the initial registration and included additional interim restrictions
    on application while new data on bees were being obtained. Today’s action,
    adding new uses, restoring previous uses, and removing certain application
    restrictions is backed by substantial data supporting the use of
    sulfoxaflor. 
    
 | 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.