EPA Registers Long-Term Uses of
Sulfoxaflor While Ensuring Strong Pollinator Protection
Registration provides
benefits to growers and is supported by strong science that shows minimal
risks for pollinators
Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is issuing a long-term approval for the insecticide
sulfoxaflor ̶ an effective tool to control challenging
pests with fewer environmental impacts. After conducting an extensive risk
analysis, including the review of one of the agency’s largest datasets on
the effects of a pesticide on bees, EPA is approving the use of sulfoxaflor
on alfalfa, corn, cacao, grains (millet, oats), pineapple, sorghum, teff,
teosinte, tree plantations, citrus, cotton, cucurbits (squash, cucumbers,
watermelons, some gourds), soybeans, and strawberries.
“EPA is providing long-term certainty for
U.S. growers to use an important tool to protect crops and avoid
potentially significant economic losses, while maintaining strong protection
for pollinators,” said Alexandra Dapolito Dunn, assistant administrator for
EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “Today’s decision
shows the agency’s commitment to making decisions that are based on sound
science.”
Sulfoxaflor is an important and highly
effective tool for growers that targets difficult pests such as sugarcane
aphids and tarnished plant bugs, also known as lygus. These pests can
damage crops and cause significant economic loss. Additionally, there are
few viable alternatives for sulfoxaflor for these pests. In many cases,
alternative insecticides may be effective only if applied repeatedly or in
a tank mix, whereas sulfoxaflor often requires fewer applications,
resulting in less risk to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife.
EPA’s registration also includes updated
requirements for product labels, which will include crop-specific
restrictions and pollinator protection language.
Background
In 2016, following a 2015 decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals vacating the registration of sulfoxaflor citing inadequate data on
the effects on bees, EPA reevaluated the data and approved registrations that did not
include crops that attract bees. The 2016 registration allowed fewer uses
than the initial registration and included additional interim restrictions
on application while new data on bees were being obtained. Today’s action,
adding new uses, restoring previous uses, and removing certain application
restrictions is backed by substantial data supporting the use of
sulfoxaflor.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.